°IJʹ

Responsible Conduct of Research

Personalise
Photo of a team working in a science lab

°IJʹ Code of Conduct and Values and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research

ճ°IJʹ Code of Conduct and Valuescame into effect on 17 May 2024. ճCode of Conduct and Valuesis a combined code that replaced several individual codes of conduct. The responsibilities in theCode of Conduct and Valuesthat most directly relate to the conduct of research include 3.1 – 3.5, 4.1, 4.2, 4.5 and 5.1. ճCode of Conduct and Valueshas adopted the(the Australian Code).°IJʹ researchers must adhere to the principles and responsibilities as set out in the Australian Code.

The Australian Code outlines the principles that characterise an honest, ethical and conscientious research culture. °IJʹ researchers must adhere to the principles and responsibilities as set out in the Australian Code atevery stageof their research activities.


The 8 Principles of responsible research conduct are:

  • HONESTY in the development, undertaking and reporting of research.
  • RIGOUR in the development, undertaking and reporting of research.
  • TRANSPARENCY in declaring interest and reporting research methodologies, data and findings.
  • FAIRNESS in the treatment of others.
  • RESPECT for research participants, the wider community, animals and the environment.

  • RECOGNITION of the right of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to be engaged in research that affects or is of significance to them.

  • ACCOUNTABILITY for the development, undertaking and reporting of research.

  • PROMOTION of responsible research practices.

A researcher is defined under the Australian Code is a “Person (or persons) who conducts, or assists with the conduct of, research.”

Therefore, at °IJʹ, the definition of researcher can include:

  • Academic staff
  • Professional/technical/non-academic staff undertaking research or a research function
  • Visiting and conjoint/adjunct appointees
  • Research Trainees, Higher Degree Research (HDR) Candidates and Coursework Students

Breaches of the Australian Code and the Code of Conduct and Values

°IJʹ recognises that most °IJʹ researchers demonstrate behaviours consistent with the Code of Conduct and Values and the Australian Code.

Behaviour contrary to the Code of Conduct and Values and the Australian Code may be ‘a breach’.From a research integrity perspective, a breach is defined as a failure by a °IJʹ researcher to meet the principles or responsibilities of the Australian Code and / or the Code of Conduct and Values. Breaches occur on a spectrum and may consist of a single breach or multiple breaches. A serious breach of the Australian Code which is also intentional or reckless or negligent may constitute Research Misconduct. Examples of research integrity breaches include:

  • Fabrication / Falsification / Misrepresentation of research data or results
  • Conducting research without ethics approval; or contrary to ethics protocols
  • Plagiarism
  • Misuse of research funds
  • Failure to disclose and manage conflicts of interest
  • Loss / Inappropriate destruction / Failure to maintain research records, data or source material

°IJʹ is committed to promoting a culture of responsible and ethical research practices.Research Integrity Advisors and theConduct & Integrity Office(C&I)provide guidance and advice regarding the responsible conduct of research and potential breaches of the Code of Conduct and Values and Australian Code. All staff have an obligation to report any issues relating to research integrity including any suspected breaches of the Code of Conduct and Values and Australian Code.

Reports of suspected or potential research integrity breaches of theCode of Conduct and Valuesand Australian Code will be managed in accordance with theComplaints Management & Investigations Policy & Procedure.

However, it is important to note that complaints relating to potential research integrity breaches are managed according to:

  • the relevant code of conduct that was in effectat the time of the alleged conduct.
  • the relevant complaint procedure that was in effectat the time the report was made.